The Archetypal Cosmos by Keiron Le Grice

The Archetypal Cosmos by Keiron Le Grice

Author:Keiron Le Grice [Le Grice, Keiron]
Language: eng
Format: epub, mobi
ISBN: 9780863158506
Publisher: Floris Books
Published: 2011-06-08T21:00:00+00:00


Notes

1. Grof and Bennett, Holotropic Mind, p. 18.

2. Grof, Psychology of the Future, pp. 56–59.

3. Campbell, Hero with a Thousand Faces, p. 8.

4. Grof, Psychology of the Future, p. 69.

5. Grof and Bennett, Holotropic Mind, p. 18.

6. Ibid., p. 84.

7. Ibid.

8. Jung, ‘On the psychology of the unconscious,’ quoted in Frey-Rohn, From Freud to Jung, p. 96.

9. ‘Within the limits of psychic experience’ Jung explains, ‘the collective unconscious takes the place of the Platonic realm of eternal Ideas. Instead of these models giving form to created things, the collective unconscious, through its archetypes, provides the a priori condition for the assignment of meaning’ (Mysterium Coniunctionis, p. 87). What is in question here is exactly what the ‘limits of psychic experience’ are. If the psyche, as Jung suggests elsewhere, rests on a transcendental background and is fundamentally connected to nature and the external world, then Jung’s theory of archetypes and the collective unconscious, in its later formulation, is closer to the Platonic position than has generally been assumed. This implication is strongly reinforced by Jung’s observations of synchronistic phenomena.

10. Jung, Spirit in Man, Art, and Literature, p. 56.

11. Jung to B.V. Raman, September 6, 1947, in C.G. Jung Letters I, p. 475.

12. For two critiques of this kind, see Hyde, Jung and Astrology, and Harding, Hymns to the Ancient Gods.

13. Hillman, ‘Back to beyond,’ p. 220.

14. Griffin, ‘Metaphysical psychology,’ pp. 239–49.

15. For a classification of Jungian psychotherapy into different approaches, see Samuels, Jung and the Post-Jungians.

16. Tarnas, Cosmos and Psyche, p. 133 (emphasis mine).

17. Frey-Rohn, From Freud to Jung, p. 284.

18. Jung, Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, p. 157.

19. Jung, Synchronicity, p. 58.

20. Jung, ‘On the nature of the psyche,’ p. 134.

21. For further detail on Jung’s Kantianism, see De Voogd, ‘C.G. Jung: psychologist of the future,’ pp. 175–82; De Voogd, ‘Fantasy versus fiction,’ pp. 204–28; Kelly, Individuation and the Absolute, pp. 22–26; Main, Revelations of Chance, pp. 34–36; Tarnas, Cosmos and Psyche, pp. 503–504.

22. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 418.

23. Wolfgang Pauli, quoted in Frey-Rohn, From Freud to Jung, p. 294. For more on the relationship between Jung and Pauli, see Meier, Atom and Archetype. For further detail on Pauli’s thinking on the relationship of mind and matter, see Atmanspacher and Primas, ‘Pauli’s ideas on mind and matter,’ p. 5–50; and Atmanspacher and Primas, ‘Hidden side of Wolfgang Pauli,’ pp. 112–126.

24. Jung and Pauli, Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche, p. 152.

25. Jung, ‘On the nature of the psyche,’ p. 148.

26. Jung and Kerényi, Science of Mythology, p. 90.

27. Campbell, Occidental Mythology, p. 12.

28. See Campbell, Hero’s Journey, pp. 40–41 and Campbell, Thou Art That, p. 18.

29. Jung to anon., letter of July 10, 1946, in C.G. Jung Letters I, p. 433.

30. According to Rudolf Otto, numinosity is a fundamental characteristic of the experience of the divine. Using Otto’s terminology, Jung describes the experience of the archetypes as numinous. See Otto, Idea of the Holy.

31. Such experiences obviously call into question Jung’s claim that the archetypes are actually unknowable



Download



Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.